Tag Archives: Quill

Florida (Finally) Enacts Wayfair Legislation

On April 19, 2021, Florida Senate Bill 50 was enacted into law. The legislation modernizes Florida’s sales and use tax system and imposes tax collection obligations on remote sellers and marketplace providers. Among the many reforms in the new legislation is the imposition of sales tax on “remote sales” and requiring tax collection by sellers lacking a physical presence in Florida. Remote sellers (seller with no physical presence in Florida) are required to collect Florida tax if they have in excess of $100,000 of retail sales for delivery into Florida in the previous calendar year. The new legislation also extends these sales tax collection obligations to marketplace providers that facilitate and collect payment for sales made by remote sellers utilizing their platform. In such instances, the marketplace provider, rather than the remote seller, would collect and remit Florida sales tax. These remote seller and marketplace provider obligations become effective July 1, 2021.

The new legislation also provides a “safe harbor” from potential past Florida tax liability. A remote seller required to collect and remit Florida tax under the new legislation will be relieved from liability for tax, penalty, and interest due on remote sales made before July 1, 2021, if they register with the Florida Department of Revenue before October 1, 2021. A similar safe harbor is provided for marketplace providers. 

Court Rules that Florida Department of Revenue Impermissibly Burdened Interstate Commerce in Violation of US Constitution

Yesterday, in American Business USA Corp. v. Department of Revenue, the Fourth District Court of Appeal for Florida ruled that the Florida Department of Revenue could not impose sales tax on sales of flowers and other tangible personal property made by a Florida corporation over the internet to out-of-state customers for out-of-state delivery. The taxpayer would use “local florists” to fill the out-of-state orders, and so the flowers and other inventory items were never stored in or brought into Florida. The court concluded that the sales did not have “substantial nexus” with Florida, and therefore imposing tax on the sales violated the dormant commerce clause of the US Constitution.

A link to the case is below:
https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/BrossMemo.Paris.TCM.WPD.pdf

Michael J. Wilson
mwilson@williamsparker.com
941-536-2043